Did your research miss anything?
Overall, I think that these theories lacked several components of real disabilities. First, while it is good that research is narrow, researchers focused on similar topics (learning disorders, autism, etc.). This meant that inhibitions such as physical, speech, and medically induced disabilities were often ignored. This perpetuates a system in which only a few of the suffering students are actively watched. Why doesn't anyone pay attention to the student who is unable to write due to physical disabilities? There are more conditions that make learning hard for students than just trouble focusing.
do you agree with the conclusions made?
I agree with a great deal of the conclusions made by these writers. I was pleased to see that people looked for multidimensional ways to help those struggling with disabilities. Yet, no one proposed real ways to make a difference. True, these are academics trying to identify a problem and not fix it, but just concluding that people are ill equipped isn't the answer. If I were to write a paper, I may add in the conclusion that a superintendent may create educating programs to fix this, or something substantive that could be put into practice. These papers did offer various ways to improve student life, but there were various issues with how to get from point A to point B.